Effects of SARS-CoV-2 on Pulmonary Function and Muscle Strength Testing in Military Subjects According to the Period of Infection: Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function can be impaired as a long-term consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pulmonary function, exercise tolerance, and muscle strength in healthy middle-aged military outpatients according during the period of infection. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out from March 2020 to November 2022 at the Military Hospital "Celio" (Rome, Italy). If someone had a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection certified by molecular nasal swab and if they performed pulmonary function tests, diffusion of carbon monoxide (DL'co), a six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), a Handgrip (HG) Test, and a One Minute Sit to Stand Test (1'STST). The included subjects were divided into two groups, A and B, according to the period of infection: A) from March 2020 to August 2021 and B) from September 2021 to October 2022. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three subjects were included in the study: 79 in Group A and 74 in Group B. Although the values were within the normal range, Group A had smaller FVC, FEV1, and DL'co compared to Group B. Group A also walked a shorter distance at the 6MWT and performed fewer repetitions in the 1'STS test compared to Group B. In both groups, the DL'co (%predicted) correlated with the 6MWT distance (R2 = 0.107, p < 0.001), the number of repetitions of the 1'STST (R2 = 0.086, p = 0.001), and the strength at the HG test (R2 = 0.08, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthy middle-aged military outpatients was more severe in the first waves than in the later ones and that, in healthy and physically fit individuals, even a marginal reduction in resting respiratory test values can have a major impact on exercise tolerance and muscles strength. Moreover, it shows that those infected more recently had symptoms related to the upper respiratory tract infection compared to those of the first waves.

Pulmonary Functional Outcomes at 3 Months in Critical COVID-19 Survivors Hospitalized during the First, Second, and Third Pandemic Waves.

INTRODUCTION: Despite improved management of patients with COVID-19, we still ignore whether pharmacologic treatments and improved respiratory support have modified outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) surviving patients of the three first consecutive waves (w) of the pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether developments in the management of ICU COVID-19 patients have positively impacted respiratory functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and chest CT scan patterns in ICU COVID-19 surviving patients at 3 months, according to pandemic waves. METHODS: We prospectively included all patients admitted to the ICU of two university hospitals with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19. Data related to hospitalization (disease severity, complications), demographics, and medical history were collected. Patients were assessed 3 months post-ICU discharge using a 6 min walking distance test (6MWT), a pulmonary function test (PFT), a respiratory muscle strength (RMS) test, a chest CT scan, and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: We included 84 ARDS COVID-19 surviving patients. Disease severity, complications, demographics, and comorbidities were similar between groups, but there were more women in wave 3 (w3). Length of stay at the hospital was shorter during w3 vs. during wave 1 (w1) (23.4 ± 14.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 20.8 days, p = 0.0304). Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation (MV) during the second wave (w2) vs. during w1 (33.3% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.0038). Assessment at 3 months after ICU discharge revealed that PFTs and 6MWTs scores were worse for w3 > w2 > w1. QoL (SF-36) deteriorated (vitality and mental health) more for patients in w1 vs. in w3 (64.7 ± 16.3 vs. 49.2 ± 23.2, p = 0.0169). Mechanical ventilation was associated with reduced forced expiratory volume (FEV1), total lung capacity (TLC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and respiratory muscle strength (RMS) (w1,2,3, p < 0.0500) on linear/logistic regression analysis. The use of glucocorticoids, as well as tocilizumab, was associated with improvements in the number of affected segments in chest CT, FEV1, TLC, and DLCO (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With better understanding and management of COVID-19, there was an improvement in PFT, 6MWT, and RMS in ICU survivors 3 months after ICU discharge, regardless of the pandemic wave during which they were hospitalized. However, immunomodulation and improved best practices for the management of COVID-19 do not appear to be sufficient to prevent significant morbidity in critically ill patients.

The outcome of pulmonary function tests and high-resolution computed tomography of chest in post-coronavirus disease 2019-confirmed cases after 3 months of recovery

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a recently prevalent infectious disease that is caused by a virus from the coronavirus family and causes acute respiratory syndrome. It is a pandemic catastrophe that has affected more than 60 million people around the world and has caused about 1.5 million deaths, as reported by the WHO. This disease affects the respiratory system and leads to different forms of symptoms and signs. Pneumonia is a common cause for hospitalization, with most patients treated in hospital wards and others requiring ICU. Although the number of complete recoveries from COVID-19 has increased, there is still concern about complications associated with the disease that appear after recovery. The studies that have looked at past types and other forms of coronavirus epidemics, such as SARS have shown that some cases had respiratory complications from the infection after being full recovered, as 36 and 30% of the entire study population had clinical and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) changes at 3 and 6 months after recovery, respectively. Mostly, the abnormalities seen in pulmonary function test (PFT) results are sequelae of diffusion capacity defect. In recovered cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome, 36% of patients showed HRCT sequelae at follow-up of 6 weeks, because of fibrosis. Data on COVID-19 indicate that prolonged disease and persistent symptoms show post-PFT affection and follow-up radiographic changes after recovery from COVID-19 as interstitial pulmonary changes and a degree of pulmonary vasculopathy. In recovered cases of COVID-19, capacity of diffusion is the commonest defect in lung function, followed by the restrictive pattern defects on spirometry;both are related to the degree of severity of pneumonic COVID-19. PFTs (involving spirometry as well as diffusion capacity) are considered as routine follow-up examinations for some of the recovered cases, especially severe cases. Rehabilitation programs of the respiratory system are an option strategy that might be considered. This study aims to show changes in pulmonary function and HRCT of chest in post-COVID-19-infected patients to detect long-term effects on the lungs after 3 months as obstructive or restrictive, or both, lung diseases. Patients and Methods: The study was conducted on 100 confirmed PCR-positive COVID-19 cases that were admitted to Ain Shams University Isolation Hospitals, and the follow-up was performed in the outpatient clinic. PCR samples (Combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab) were taken after 3 months from discharge of patients above the age of 18 years who become negative with clinical improvement. PFT [spirometry and diffusion for carbon monoxide (DLCO)] and chest HRCT were done. All patients' clinical data were recorded, and CT chest imaging data of these patients were correlated with the clinical data. Result(s): A total of 100 patients were included in this study, where males represented 58% and female represented 42%. The mean+/-SD age of cases in this study was 45.05 +/- 11.80 years and ranged from 20 to 79 years. CT chest severity score (SS) of abnormality in COVID-19-infectedd patients based on HRCT chest findings before and after 3 months from treatment showed a highly significant correlation (P=0.000). The results of PFT in the studied group after 3 months of discharge showed restrictive pattern in 14.9%, obstructive pattern in 17.8%, and both obstructive and restrictive patterns in 5.9% of the total number of cases. There was a significant correlation between DLCO abnormality findings and age of studied group (P=0.032), a significant correlation between abnormality findings on PFT and HRCT chest SS after discharge of the studied group (P0.001). There was a significant correlation between abnormality findings of DLCO and HRCT chest SS after 3 months of the studied group (P=0.000) and before treatment (P=0.001), whereas there was no significant correlation between other findings of PFT and HRCT chest SS after 3 months and before. There was a significant correlation between H

Post-recovery pulmonary function test and thorax CT correlations in COVID-19 survivors

Aim: Long-COVID has been described as persistent symptoms involving multiorgan systems in COVID-19 survivors. This single-centred study investigated the correlation between pulmonary function test (PFT) and thorax computed tomography (CT) results in COVID-19 survivors after six months of follow-up period. Material(s) and Method(s): Patients recovered from COVID-19 aged between 18 and 50 years were included in this study and divided into two groups according to PFT results as patients with normal PFT results (PFT normal;n = 74) and with PFT results with restrictive pattern (PFT restrictive;n = 12). The primary aim of this study was to try to predict the prognosis of long-term chronic pulmonary system diseases using pulmonary function test, thorax CT and laboratory findings in the sixth month after recovery. Result(s): There were no significant differences between the patients in PFT normal and PFT restrictive groups in terms of symptoms and CT findings at admission. On the other hand, the rate of dyspnoea and exertional dyspnoea was significantly more pronounced in patients in PFT restrictive group, while there were no significant differences between CT findings. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that percent forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) and percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) results are associated factors in discriminating normal and PFT results with restrictive pattern in COVID-19 survivors. Discussion(s): PFTs should be included in follow-up evaluations of COVID-19 patients in order to elucidate the post-COVID-19 pulmonary abnormalities.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.

Pulmonary Function Test as a Diagnostic Tool for Post-COVID-19 Effects.

COVID-19-infected survivors are reporting persistent anomalies upon hospital discharge. After one year, a sizable percentage of COVID-19 survivors still have persistent symptoms affecting different bodily systems. Evidence suggests that the lungs are the most affected organs by COVID-19. It may also cause corollary and other medical issues. The literature on preceding COVID-19 infections reviews that patients may also experience chronic impairment in breathing characteristics after discharge. The outcome of COVID-19 may remain for weeks to months after the initial recovery. Our goal is to determine the superiority of the restrictive pattern, obstructive pattern, and adjusted diffusion in patients post-COVID-19 contamination and to explain the distinctive opinions of breathing characteristics used with those patients. Therefore, lung function tests were measured post-discharge for three to 12 months. According to estimates, 80% of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients experienced one or more chronic symptoms. Multidisciplinary teams are required to develop preventive measures, rehabilitation methods, and scientific control plans with a completely patient-centered attitude for long-term COVID-19 care. Clarifying the pathophysiologic mechanisms, creating and testing specific interventions, and treating patients with long-term COVID-19 are urgently needed. The goal of this review is to locate research evaluating COVID-19's long-term effects. A person who has suffered from COVID-19 in the past showed changes in their pulmonary function test. So, we have to notice the changes and recovery from post-COVID-19 effects. COVID-19 survivors were observed in an eventual observational study and continuously examined three, six, and 12 months after having COVID-19 infections. We evaluated the clinical features and concentrations of circulating pulmonary epithelial and endothelial markers in COVID-19 survivors with normal or lower diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) six months after discharge to analyze risk factors and underlying pathophysiology.

Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Covid-19 Patients Discharged From a Tertiary Care Center: A Prospective Study.

To determine the cardiopulmonary changes in the survivors of acute COVID-19 infection at 3-6 month and 6-12 month. We followed up 53 patients out of which 28 (52%) had mild COVID-19 and 25 (48%) had severe COVID-19. The first follow-up was between 3 month after diagnosis up to 6 month and second follow-up between 6 and 12 month from the date of diagnosis of acute COVID-19. They were monitored using vital parameters, pulmonary function tests, echocardiography and a chest computed tomography (CT) scan. We found improvement in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) with a median of 52% of predicted and 80% of predicted at the first and second follow-up, respectively. There was improvement in the CTSS in severe group from 22 (18-24) to 12 (10-18; p-0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed increased odds of past severe disease with higher CTSS at follow-up (OR-1.7 [CI 1.14-2.77]; P = 0.01). Correlation was found between CTSS and DLCO at second follow-up (r2 = 0.36; p < 0.01). Most of patients recovered from COVID-19 but a subgroup of patients continued to have persistent radiological and pulmonary function abnormalities necessitating a structured follow-up.

Post-COVID Interstitial Lung Disease and Other Lung Sequelae.

As the world emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians and researchers across the world are trying to understand the sequelae in patients recovered from COVID-19 infection. In this article, the authors review post-acute sequelae of SARS-COV-2, interstitial lung disease, and other lung sequelae in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

Assessment of respiratory function and exercise tolerance at 4-6 months after COVID-19 infection in patients with pneumonia of different severity.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of COVID-19 systemic consequences is a wide research field in which respiratory function assessment has a pivotal role. However, the available data in the literature are still sparse and need further strengthening. AIM: To assess respiratory function 4-6 months after hospital discharge based on lung disease severity in patients who overcome COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Patients hospitalised either in the Internal Medicine Department (IMD) for moderate to severe disease or in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for critical disease underwent spirometry with maximal flow-volume curve, lung volumes, lung diffusion capacity (DLCO ) and six-minute walking test (6-MWT). RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 40 from the IMD and 48 from the ICU. In both cohorts, there was a greater prevalence of male patients. In the IMD cohort, 38% of patients showed at least one altered respiratory parameter, while 62% in the ICU cohort did so (P < 0.05). Total lung capacity (TLC) and DLCO were the most frequently altered parameters: 15% and 33% from IMD versus 33% and 56% from ICU, respectively (P < 0.05). In IMD patients, 5% had only restrictive deficit, 22% had only lung diffusion impairment and 10% had both. In ICU patients, 6% had only restrictive deficit, 29% had only lung diffusion impairment and 27% had both (P < 0.05). ICU patients showed a higher frequency of abnormal 6-MWT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Lung function tests and 6-MWT are highly informative tools for monitoring the negative consequences of COVID-19 pneumonia, which were more frequent and more complex in patients discharged from ICU.

The functional consequences in severe and critical covid-19 survivors - A pilot study.

PURPOSE: To perform pulmonary function tests (PFT) in severe COVID-19 survivors one and five months after hospital discharge in order to assess the lung function, as well to identify clinical characteristics and PFT parameters associated with worse cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study included 75 patients with severe form of COVID-19. PFT was conducted one and five months after hospital discharge, in addition to CPET in a second assessment. Patients with a previous history of chronic respiratory diseases were excluded from our study. RESULTS: One month after hospital discharge, all examined patients had diffusion lung capacity for carbon-monoxide(DLco%) below the 80% of predicted values (in mean 58%), with 40% of patients having a restrictive pattern (total lung capacity(TLC) < 80%). In a repeated assessment after five months, pathological DLco% persisted in 40% of patients, while all other PFT parameters were normal. CPET showed reduced maximum oxygen consumption during exercise testing (VO2peak%) values in 80% of patients (in mean 69%), and exercise ventilatory inefficiency in 60%. Patients with VO2peak < 60% had significantly lower values of examined PFT parameters, both one and five months after hospital discharge. Patients with VO2peak% ≥ 60% had a significantly higher increase after the second assessment for Forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1%), Forced expiratory volume in 1st second and forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC), DLco% and Diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide corrected for alveolar volume (DLco/VA). CONCLUSION: Significant functional abnormalities, according to PFT and CPET, was present both one and five months in severe COVID-19 survivors, thus emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive follow-up including both resting and dynamic functional assessment in these patients.

Evaluation of Pulmonary Functions After Discharge in Pediatric Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective Study.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the pulmonary function of pediatric patients with COVID-19 after recovery. Methods: Pediatric patients aged 5-18 years hospitalized with diagnoses of COVID-19 and discharged with recovery were included in this prospective study. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed through spirometry. Results: The patient group consisted of 34 children and the control group of 33. The forced vital capacity (FVC%) values of the control and patient groups were 110.62±11.71 and 94.21±13.68 (p<0.001), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1%) values were 104.91±6.26 and 98.67±14.93 (p=0.032), FEV1/FVC% values were 108.50±8.81 and 101.06±24.89 (p=0.034), and forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25-75% values were 106.71±6.68 and 101.85±24.89, respectively (p=0.286). However, Spearman correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlation between length of hospital stay and FEF 25-75% (r=-0.364, p=0.35). Conclusion: PFTs in pediatric patients after recovery from COVID-19 were abnormal in the present study. The results were significant in terms of the development of mixed-type lung disease. Further long- and short-term studies are now needed for a better understanding of the prognosis in these patients.

Lung-Heart Outcomes and Mortality through the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic in a Prospective Cohort of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Patients.

We investigated lung-heart toxicity and mortality in 123 women with stage I-II breast cancer enrolled in 2007-2011 in a prospective trial of adjuvant radiotherapy (TomoBreast). We were concerned whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected the outcomes. All patients were analyzed as a single cohort. Lung-heart status was reverse-scored as freedom from adverse-events (fAE) on a 1-5 scale. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and pulmonary function tests were untransformed. Statistical analyses applied least-square regression to calendar-year aggregated data. The significance of outliers was determined using the Dixon and the Grubbs corrected tests. At 12.0 years median follow-up, 103 patients remained alive; 10-years overall survival was 87.8%. In 2007-2019, 15 patients died, of whom 11 were cancer-related deaths. In 2020, five patients died, none of whom from cancer. fAE and lung-heart function declined gradually over a decade through 2019, but deteriorated markedly in 2020: fAE dipped significantly from 4.6-4.6 to 4.3-4.2; LVEF dipped to 58.4% versus the expected 60.3% (PDixon = 0.021, PGrubbs = 0.054); forced vital capacity dipped to 2.4 L vs. 2.6 L (PDixon = 0.043, PGrubbs = 0.181); carbon-monoxide diffusing capacity dipped to 12.6 mL/min/mmHg vs. 15.2 (PDixon = 0.008, PGrubbs = 0.006). In conclusion, excess non-cancer mortality was observed in 2020. Deaths in that year totaled one-third of the deaths in the previous decade, and revealed observable lung-heart deterioration.

Assessment of Pulmonary Function Tests in COVID-19 Convalescents Six Months after Infection.

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the pulmonary function tests (PFT) in COVID-19 convalescents six months after recovery. Additionally, the research question was whether PFT should be performed routinely in post-COVID-19 patients. Methods: A total of 39 patients with a history of COVID-19 6 months prior to the study were included in the study (Group I). Individuals were hospitalized or treated in the outpatients department. The control group (Group II) consisted of 39 healthy patients without a COVID-19 history. Each subject completed a questionnaire interview and underwent laboratory and pulmonary function examinations. Results: Six months after COVID-19 recovery, patients mainly complained about cough (46%, n = 18), shortness of breath (23%, n = 9), weakness (13%, n = 5), and memory/concentration disorders (8%, n = 3). In the group of patients complaining of persistent cough present 6 months after COVID-19, the following PFT parameters were decreased: FEV1, FVC, FRC, TLC, and DLCO (p < 0.05) in comparison with patients without this symptom. Conclusions: Persistent shortness of breath is not necessarily associated with pulmonary function impairment in patients 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and hence it requires appropriate differential diagnosis. Patients with a cough persisting 6 months after the acute phase of COVID-19 may benefit from PFT.

Long-term dyspnea, regional ventilation distribution and peripheral lung function in COVID-19 survivors: a 1 year follow up study.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is common after COVID-19 pneumonia and can be characterized by a defective CO2 diffusion (DLCO) despite normal pulmonary function tests (PFT). Nevertheless, DLCO impairment tends to normalize at 1 year, with no dyspnea regression. The altered regional distribution of ventilation and a dysfunction of the peripheral lung may characterize dyspnea at 1 year after COVID-19 pneumonia. We aimed at assessing the pattern of airway resistance and inflammation and the regional ventilation inhomogeneity in COVID-19 pneumonia survivors at 12-months after hospital discharge. METHODS: We followed up at 1-year patients previously admitted to the respiratory units (intensive care or sub-intensive care unit) for COVID-19 acute respiratory failure at 1-year after hospital discharge. PFT (spirometry, DLCO), impulse oscillometry (IOS), measurements of the exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) were used to evaluate lung volumes, CO2 diffusion capacity, peripheral lung inflammation/resistances and the regional inhomogeneity of ventilation distribution. A full medical examination was conducted, and symptoms of new onset (not present before COVID-19) were recorded. Patients were therefore divided into two groups based on the presence/absence of dyspnea (defined as mMRC ≥1) compared to evaluate differences in the respiratory function derived parameters. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were admitted between October and December 2020. Of them, 42/67 (63%) patients were discharged alive and 33 were evaluated during the follow up. Their mean age was 64 ± 11 years and 24/33 (73%) were males. Their maximum respiratory support was in 7/33 (21%) oxygen, in 4/33 (12%) HFNC, in 14/33 (42%) NIV/CPAP and in 8/33 (24%) invasive mechanical ventilation. During the clinical examination, 15/33 (45%) reported dyspnea. When comparing the two groups, no significant differences were found in PFT, in the peripheral airway inflammation (FENO) or mechanical properties (IOS). However, EIT showed a significantly higher regional inhomogeneity in patients with dyspnea both during resting breathing (0.98[0.96-1] vs 1.1[1-1.1], p = 0.012) and during forced expiration (0.96[0.94-1] vs 1 [0.98-1.1], p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: New onset dyspnea characterizes 45% of patients 1 year after COVID-19 pneumonia. In these patients, despite pulmonary function test may be normal, EIT shows a higher regional inhomogeneity both during quiet and forced breathing which may contribute to dyspnea. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04343053, registration date 13/04/2020.

Accuracy of quality of life questionnaire as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary sequelae.

Background: Follow-up after hospital discharge of SARS-CoV-2 survivors represents a huge burden on the healthcare system. We attempt to assess the utility of symptoms and health-related quality of life questionnaire (SF-12) to identify SARS CoV2 pulmonary sequelae. Methods: Prospective, non-interventional follow-up study. A cardiopulmonary exercise test, functional respiratory test (PFT), SF12 questionnaire were performed after hospitalization at six months after the first positive PCR smear. Results: 41 patients were included, female (39%), mean age 57.3 ± 13.7 years. 70% persisted with symptoms. 46% presented a maximum oxygen consumption below 80% of predicted. SF-12 physical domain score was significantly reduced in patients with altered PFT (32.7 vs. 45.9; p < 0.001) and obtained the best sensitivity and specificity to identify PFT alterations (AUC 0.862, Sensitivity 85.7%, Specificity 81.5%). Conclusions: SF-12 questionnaire shows high sensitivity and specificity to detect SARS CoV2 survivors with pulmonary function alterations.

Antecedentes y objetivos: El seguimiento tras el alta hospitalaria de los supervivientes de SARS-CoV-2 representa una enorme carga para el sistema sanitario. Intentamos evaluar la utilidad de los síntomas y el cuestionario de calidad de vida (SF-12) para identificar los pacientes con secuelas pulmonares por SARS-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de seguimiento prospectivo observacional. Después de la hospitalización, a los 6 meses del primer frotis con PCR positiva se realizaron: una prueba de esfuerzo cardiopulmonar, pruebas funcionales respiratorias (PFR) y se aplicó el cuestionario SF-12. Resultados: Se incluyó a 41 pacientes, el 39% eran mujeres, con una edad media de 57,3 ± 13,7 años. El 70% persistía con síntomas. El 46% presentó un consumo máximo de oxígeno por debajo del 80% del predicho. La puntuación del dominio físico del SF-12 fue significativamente más baja en pacientes con PFR alteradas (32,7 vs. 45,9; p < 0,001) y obtuvo la mejor sensibilidad y especificidad para identificar las alteraciones de las PFR (AUC 0,862; sensibilidad 85,7% y especificidad 81,5%). Conclusiones: El cuestionario de calidad de vida SF-12 presenta una alta sensibilidad y especificidad para detectar a los sobrevivientes de SARS-CoV-2 con alteraciones de la función pulmonar.

Benefits of Telemonitoring of Pulmonary Function-3-Month Follow-Up of Home Electronic Spirometry in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: In patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), the respiratory system determines the quality and length of life; therefore, the search for easy and safe everyday monitoring of the pulmonary function is currently extremely important, particularly in the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of a three-month home electronic spirometry (e-spirometry) monitoring of the pulmonary function and strength of respiratory muscles as well as the patients' benefits from this telemetric program. METHODS: Twenty-one boys with DMD (aged 7-22; non-ambulatory-11) received a remote electronic spirometer for home use with a special application dedicated for patients and connected with a doctor platform. Control of the hospital spirometry (forced vital capacity-FVC, forced expiratory volume in 1 second-FEV1, peak expiratory flow-PEF) and respiratory muscle strength (maximal inspiratory-MIP and expiratory pressures-MEP) before and after the three-month monitoring were performed as well telemonitoring benefit survey. RESULTS: A total of 1403 measurements were performed; 15 of the participants were able to achieve correct attempts. There were no differences between the hospital and the home spirometry results as well as between respiratory muscle strength during v1 vs. v2 visits for the whole study group (all parameters p > 0.05); the six participants achieved increased value of FVC during the study period. There was a positive correlation between ΔFVC and the number of assessments during the home spirometry (r = 0.7, p < 0.001). Differences between FVC and MIPcmH2O (r = 0.58; p = 0.01), MEPcmH2O (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) was revealed. The mean general satisfaction rating of the telemonitoring was 4.46/5 (SD 0.66) after one month and 4.91/5 (SD 0.28) after three months. The most reported benefit of the home monitoring was the improvement in breathing (38% of participants after one month, 52% after three months of telemonitoring). Forgetting about the procedures was the most common reason for irregular measurements; the participants reported also increased motivation but less time to perform tests. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates high compliance of the home telemonitoring results with the examination in the hospital. Benefits from home spirometry were visible for all participants; the most important benefit was breathing improvement. The remote home spirometry is usable for everyday monitoring of the pulmonary function in DMD patients as well can be also treated as respiratory muscle training.

Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Pulmonary Function Tests and Exercise Tolerance.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been shown to cause long-term pulmonary sequelae. OBJECTS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on pulmonary function and on the 6-min walk test related to the severity of the disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the "Policlinico Tor Vergata" Academic Hospital (Rome, Italy), including 75 patients evaluated in post-COVID clinics at the Respiratory Units between November 2020 and September 2021. Complete pulmonary function tests, 6-min walk tests and persistence of symptoms were performed. RESULTS: Of the 75 subjects, 23 had mild, 16 moderate, 26 severe and 10 very severe COVID-19, classified according to WHO. Very severe patients had a lower FVC (100 ± 10%pr) compared to the other groups (116 ± 16%pr, 116 ± 13%pr, 122 ± 20%pr from mild to severe; p < 0.05) and a lower TLC (94 ± 13%pr) compared to the others (102 ± 10%pr, 108 ± 15%pr, 108 ± 12%pr from mild to severe; p < 0.05). DLco and DLco/VA were similar among groups. At the 6MWT, distance, rest and nadir SpO2 were similar among groups, but all groups presented a significant decrease in SpO2 from rest to nadir (Rest SpO2: 97.0 ± 1.0% vs. Nadir SpO2: 93.6 ± 2.7%, p < 0.01). A positive correlation was found between desaturation and delta SpO2 (rest-nadir) (R: 0.29, p < 0.05) and the Distance Desaturation Product (R: 0.39, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that, although the PFTs are within the normal range, there is still a mild restrictive spirometric pattern after six months in very severe subjects. Moreover, the only persistent pathological sequalae of SARS-CoV-2 infection were a mild desaturation at 6MWT, despite the severity of the infection.

One-year follow-up CT findings in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often causes radiological and functional pulmonary sequelae. However, evidence on 1-year follow-up of pulmonary sequelae is limited. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and time-course of pulmonary sequelae after recovery from COVID-19 through 1-year follow-up. We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases on 25 February 2022, and included studies with computed tomography (CT) findings at the 1-year follow-up. The extracted data on CT findings were analysed using a one-group meta-analysis. We further analysed the data in relation to COVID-19 severity, improvement rate and lung function. Fifteen eligible studies (N = 3134) were included. One year after COVID-19, 32.6% (95% CI 24.0-42.6, I2  = 92.9%) presented with residual CT abnormalities. Ground-glass opacity and fibrotic-like changes were frequently observed in 21.2% (95% CI 15.4-28.4, I2  = 86.7%) and 20.6% (95% CI 11.0-35.2, I2  = 91.9%), respectively. While the gradual recovery was seen on CT (52.9% [mid-term] vs. 32.6% [1 year]), the frequency of CT abnormalities was higher in the severe/critical cases than in the mild/moderate cases (37.7% vs. 20.7%). In particular, fibrotic changes showed little improvement between 4-7 months and 1 year after COVID-19. Pulmonary function tests at 1 year also showed the decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, especially in severe/critical cases. Our meta-analysis indicated that residual CT abnormalities were common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 1 year after recovery, especially fibrotic changes in severe/critical cases. As these sequelae may last long, vigilant observations and longer follow-up periods are warranted.

Accuracy of quality of life questionnaire as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary sequelae.

BACKGROUND: Follow-up after hospital discharge of SARS-CoV-2 survivors represents a huge burden on the healthcare system. We attempt to assess the utility of symptoms and health-related quality of life questionnaire (SF-12) to identify SARS CoV2 pulmonary sequelae. METHODS: Prospective, non-interventional follow-up study. A cardiopulmonary exercise test, functional respiratory test (PFT), SF12 questionnaire were performed after hospitalization at six months after the first positive PCR smear. RESULTS: 41 patients were included, female (39%), mean age 57.3±13.7 years. 70% persisted with symptoms. 46% presented a maximum oxygen consumption below 80% of predicted. SF-12 physical domain score was significantly reduced in patients with altered PFT (32.7 vs. 45.9; p<0.001) and obtained the best sensitivity and specificity to identify PFT alterations (AUC 0.862, Sensitivity 85.7%, Specificity 81.5%). CONCLUSIONS: SF-12 questionnaire shows high sensitivity and specificity to detect SARS CoV2 survivors with pulmonary function alterations.

Post-recovery pulmonary function test and thorax CT correlations in COVID-19 survivors PFT and Thorax CT Results in COVID-19 Survivors

Aim: Long-COVID has been described as persistent symptoms involving multiorgan systems in COVID-19 survivors. This single-centred study investigated the correlation between pulmonary function test (PFT) and thorax computed tomography (CT) results in COVID-19 survivors after six months of follow-up period. Material and Methods: Patients recovered from COVID-19 aged between 18 and 50 years were included in this study and divided into two groups according to PFT results as patients with normal PFT results (PFT normal;n = 74) and with PFT results with restrictive pattern (PFT restrictive;n = 12). The primary aim of this study was to try to predict the prognosis of long-term chronic pulmonary system diseases using pulmonary function test, thorax CT and laboratory findings in the sixth month after recovery. Results: There were no significant differences between the patients in PFT normal and PFT restrictive groups in terms of symptoms and CT findings at admission. On the other hand, the rate of dyspnoea and exertional dyspnoea was significantly more pronounced in patients in PFT restrictive group, while there were no significant differences between CT findings. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that percent forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) and percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) results are associated factors in discriminating normal and PFT results with restrictive pattern in COVID-19 survivors. Discussion: PFTs should be included in follow-up evaluations of COVID-19 patients in order to elucidate the post-COVID-19 pulmonary abnormalities.

Effect of Chest Physiotherapy Sessions in Post COVID-19 Patients

In recent few years World has been facing a catastrophe known as COVID 19 a hazardous respiratory and multisystemic disease claiming millions of deaths all around the Globe and the count is still increasing. Chest physiotherapy technique is based on the theory that when several areas of the chest and back are percussed, shock waves are conducted through the chest wall, slackening the airway secretions. The present study was undertaken to see effects of physiotherapy sessions on pulmonary functions of post COVID patients. In this hospital based cross sectional study a sum of 51 patients were observed for the outcomes. Patients coming to the institute with sign and symptoms of COVID in second wave from March 2021 to September 2021 with RTPCR positive report and having CT involvement more than 60% (CT score 15) were assigned. Patients with a negative report by 15 days were selected for present study after written and informed consent. These selected patients were undergone physiotherapy sessions and pulmonary function testings as per study protocol. Considering the results of spirometry except FEV1 rest other parameters like FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF 25-75% and PEFR were not significant even after 15 days of extensive physiotherapy. These results were suggestive of positive effects of chest physiotherapy training on post COVID patients after a minimum of 30 days training. CONCLUSION - Hence from the present study this can be concluded that physiotherapy helps in improving the pulmonary function tests in post COVID patients at least after a 30 days of training session. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) is the property of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)